BBC chief who got 450,000 golden goodbye after just 54 days in the job wanted MOREBBC Trust Chairman Lord Patten defended Mr Entwistle's 450,000 payoff after just 54 days in the job as Director-General Before his dramatic resignation, Mr Entwistle asked Lord Patten 'Are you urging me to go' Trust chairman replied, 'No, but we are not urging you to stay'They finally agreed a deal of one year's salary, legal fees and private healthcare for 12 monthsIf Savile inquiries conclude Mr Entwistle breached broadcasting guidelines, BBC can claw back moneyLord Patten refuses to publish hours he works calling it 'impertinent'
Licence fee payers will pick up bill for two BBC Savile inquiries, MPs told, with 200,000 spent so far
Those interviewed as part of Pollard review will each get up to 50,000 of legal fees paid, acting DG Tim Davie reveals



04:08 GMT, 28 November 2012

George Entwistle demanded even more than the 450,000 exit deal he secured after a disastrous 54 days as director general of the BBC, it emerged yesterday.

Lord Patten, who chairs the BBC Trust, admitted the final settlement was a ‘hell of a lot of money’ but insisted paying him off was the best course of action.

There has been a public outcry at the award of 12 months’ salary with the Prime Minister saying it was hard to justify. But Lord Patten claimed it would have cost the BBC at least 80,000 more if the Mr Entwistle had sued for unfair dismissal.

Scroll down for video

Cost: Lord Patten told MPs this mornings that taxpayers must 'bear the cost'

Revelations: Lord Patten has lifted the lid on what happened on the day George Entwistle resigned and the decision to pay him 450,000 to leave

Appearing before MPs on the Commons media select committee, Lord Patten declined to elaborate on exactly how much more Mr Entwistle had asked for.

But he outlined the events leading up to the director general’s departure on November 10, revealing he had told him ‘we are not urging you to go, but we are not urging you to stay either’.

Mr Entwistle agreed to leave but insisted on 12 months of pay and private medical cover, and 35,000 for legal expenses and 10,000 for public relations assistance for a three-month period.

Contractually, he was entitled to six months, or 225,000.

Mr Entwistle had faced heavy criticism firstly over concerns about management interference on a shelved Newsnight investigation into allegations of abuse by Jimmy Savile.

Conversation: On the day he resigned George Entwistle asked if Patten was urging him to resign, and he said he wasn't but wasn't going to urge him to stay

Conversation: On the day he resigned George Entwistle asked if Patten was urging him to resign, and he said he wasn't but wasn't going to urge him to stay

He was finally forced to quit after the same show wrongly implicated Lord McAlpine in a child abuse scandal – leading to a 185,000 payout.

Lord Patten added that Mr Entwistle’s ‘450,000 was one hell of a lot of money’ but lawyers had said it was better than any other course of action.


One year's salary – 450,000

Bupa health policy – 1,200 per year

Legal fees for setting up deal – up to 10,000

Legal fees for 2 Newsnight inquiries – 25,000

'Communications budget' – 10,000

Pension pot – 883,000 or 40,000 per year

The money will be paid to Mr Entwistle in December, following the conclusion of the Pollard Inquiry, and some of it could be clawed back if he is found to have broken any disciplinary rules by any of the ongoing inquiries.

Acting director general Tim Davie has revealed costs for the Pollard investigation have already topped 200,000. Around 40 people are eligible for assistance and the BBC has placed a tentative cap of 50,000 on legal fees for individuals.

Lord Patten said after discussions with lawyers it became clear to him that without doing a deal, the case could develop into one of constructive dismissal or unfair dismissal, ultimately costing even more.

He said: '450,000 is one hell of a lot of money.

'The idea that I did not understand how politically difficult it would be suggests a degree of political innocence on my part which I have to tell you does not exist.

'But the options I had were absolutely clear.

'We either had to deal with it quickly there and then, broadly speaking on the terms of 12 months, though that was less than we were asking for, or we had to go to constructive dismissal and constructive dismissal would have landed us with exactly the same amount of money, plus almost certainly another 80,000 of unfair dismissal.'

At times, the former governor of Hong
Kong looked uncomfortable and was asked if he should also resign because
he was the man who recruited Mr Entwistle.

Wish: Lord Patten said that Mr Entwistle was a 'decent man' adding he had struggled to cope with the crisis that engulfed the BBC when he was in charge

Wish: Lord Patten said that Mr Entwistle was a 'decent man' adding he had struggled to cope with the crisis that engulfed the BBC when he was in charge

Discussing Mr Entwistles pay-deal he continued: 'I do wish that his lawyers had counselled him strongly to accept 225,000, of course I do, because I think he does not deserve the damage to his reputation.'

Mr Entwistle is 'a decent man and doesn’t deserve to be bullied or have his character demolished', he added.

Committee chairman John Whittingdale said Mr Entwistle’s own performance in front of the committee had been 'depressing'.

Lord Patten said it had cost 186,000 in recruitment costs to fill the seat eventually taken by Mr Entwistle.

'Pretty much everyone said at the time it was a very good choice,” he said.

'I think he was completely overwhelmed by Savile and all that came after it.'

He said he thought Mr Entwistle 'found it incredibly difficult to cope with a crisis in which he had been initially involved.'

He found it 'much more difficult than you or I', he told MPs, 'to cope with photographers and cameras at his door'.

'We have maybe got thicker skins,' he added.

At every stage he was taking advice from lawyers Baker & McKenzie, the peer added.

'I discussed it with Baker & McKenzie among other things on this basis – when I have to defend this in front of the PAC (Public Accounts Committee) is it defensible

'Their agreement was not only is it defensible but it is better than any other course of action, unless we wanted the BBC to drift on without somebody at the top.'

'What did we get in return,' he said. 'First of all we got a settlement that was less than we would have got had we gone through constructive dismissal.

VIDEO: Awkward BBC Chairman admits George Entwistle wanted bigger payoff.


Grilled: BBC Trust chairman Lord Patten (right) and acting director general Tim Davie were at times given a tough time by MPs

Grilled: BBC Trust chairman Lord Patten (right) and acting director general Tim Davie were at times given a tough time by MPs today

'Secondly, we got a warranty from Mr Entwistle that if Pollard or anything else finds that has has done anything which is in breach of his contract or the BBC disciplinary guidelines, we can claw back some of the remunerations that has been paid.'

Asked whether money had been kept back, Lord Patten said it would not be paid until December.

He added: 'When we were doing that deal on Saturday night in difficult circumstances I was not unaware of the fact that I would have to explain it very carefully to committees like this in the future because licence feepayers would inevitably be very concerned about it.'

Conservative MP Angie Bray said that 'some people might find it very strange' that the new director general Tony Hall would be drawing a pension from the BBC when he starts work due to his previous employment at the BBC.

Lord Patten said he had paid his contribution to his pension.

He said it was 'maybe' correct to say Entwistle would still be in the job if he had taken more decisive action.

'I hope he will still be able to do a terrific job somewhere in the media,' he said.

An MP told the committee that a constituent told him about the Entwistle pay off: 'If that's honourable, I'm a banana.'

Meanwhile, the police investigation into the Savile scandal has cost around 2 million so far, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner said yesterday. Bernard Hogan-Howe gave a committee of MPs an estimated cost for Operation Yewtree, which involves a team of 30 officers. Earlier this month the force said it was dealing with around 450 potential victims, the vast majority of whom claimed they had fallen prey to the DJ.



Saturday November 10, 2012

After two disastrous interviews on Radio 4 and 5Live George Entwistle
says he 'still has a job to do' and will not quit as director general

Entwistle meets the BBC Trust board and they discussed his management
of the crisis at and he leaves the meeting knowing that he did not have
their full confidence

3.45pm: After
he exits the room trustees discuss they are concerned that he is not
taking the situation as seriously as they think he should and discuss
the options open to them. He then asks Lord Patten if he wants him to quit and he says 'no', but would not urge him to stay

Mr Entwistle tells BBC's human resources about the terms he would be
willing to accept to quit his job – more than a year's salary plus other

8pm: After legal discussions BBC Trust chairman Lord Patten calls members of its remuneration committee to discuss the severance package

8.45pm: A meeting of the Trust was hastily convened to rubber-stamp the deal

9pm: George Entwistle announces that he has resigned

VIDEO: Arguably we could have been faster reacting to Savile claims. Lord Patten faces inquiry


Taxpayers will have to 'bear the
costs' of the BBC inquiries in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal,
'however much they are', Lord Patten also revealed today.

MPs were also told that 40 individuals will be interviewed as part of the Pollard Review,
including failed Director General George Entwistle, who could get up to
50,000 of legal fees paid 'in extreme circumstances', taking the
potential bill to 2million.

Trust chairman Lord Patten said this probe, which is examining a
shelved Newsnight report into Jimmy Savile's abuse, is expected to be
completed by Christmas, but a second review led by Dame Janet Smith,
looking at the culture and practices of the BBC during the years in
which Jimmy Savile worked there, could take much longer.


Chris Patten

BBC Trust chairman Lord Patten was forced to defend his role amid scathing criticism by MPs today.

He became embroiled in a spat with Conservative MP Philip Davies as he was grilled about his job.

Asked by Mr Davies to supply a full itinerary of his daily work for the corporation, the peer refused, saying the question was 'impertinent'.

Lord Patten had been asked how many days he devoted to his job as chairman of the BBC Trust, saying: 'At the moment about eight'.

He said he spent three or four days a week on BBC premises, but probably more on BBC work outside that.
Pressed on the point later in the meeting, he was asked for an itinerary of his day by Mr Davies, to which he refused, saying: 'I think it's a thoroughly impertinent question'.

'I think you're entitled to know how much time I'm spending, I think you're entitled to put down freedom of information requests for how many days I spend in the office, or how many days I spend doing other things.

'But if you think I am going to do a diary for you in order to satisfy some populist pursuit of somebody you didn't want to run an organisation which you don't want to exist, you are kidding yourself.

'Do you want to know my toilet habits What else do you want to know'

Mr Davies fought the apparent slapdown, saying: 'Given you have been presiding over a shambles at the BBC I think it's perfectly reasonable to say have you been actually putting in the hours, putting in the yard as you should have been as chairman of the BBC Trust.'

After declaring other roles that he received remuneration for, Lord Patten said: 'I don't have anything else to add.'

Lord Patten said it was impossible to predict how much the reviews, which were ordered in the wake of allegations over Jimmy Savile, would cost.

He said they were expecting the Pollard report next month, 'certainly before Christmas', but said the second review would take longer, because of a 'huge email trawl' that needs going through.

Asked about the cost of the inquiries – which he said would be met by the licence payer – Lord Patten said: 'We don't yet know, but they will clearly be expensive, partly because of the number of lawyers involved.

Costs: BBC acting director general Tim Davie gives evidence at the Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee and said individuals could get up to 50,000 in legal costs

Costs: BBC acting director general Tim Davie gives evidence at the Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee and said individuals could get up to 50,000 in legal costs

'The Pollard inquiry has a QC who does the questioning at each session and I am told that QCs don't come cheap.

'I don't see how we could conceivably set down a capped cost without seeming to cap the work of the inquiries.'

He added: 'Other institutions which allowed Jimmy Savile to work and operate have not yet agreed inquiries into what actually happened, even though it's a couple of months since the allegations were made.

'We think we have gone about this in exactly the right way and I am afraid we must bear the costs, however much they are.'

Lord Patten said the full Pollard Review would be published.

Acting director-general Tim Davie said the money for the report was coming from a contingency fund.

'One of the things we feel very strongly about is that it should not impact on programme-making areas,' he said.

Lord Patten defended spending just three days on the inquiry into what went wrong into the second, botched Newsnight investigation, saying the “issues were more straight-forward”.

He said there had been 'appalling editorial judgment' and that the 'journalism involved, to be polite, was shoddy'.

He said disciplinary hearings were currently taking place into what went wrong with the second

Newsnight programme, which wrongly implicated Lord McAlpine in child abuse.

Mr Davie said of the investigation: 'You have a limited cast of characters and you can quickly get to a fair assessment of events.'

Lord Patten said it was right that he did not get involved when he saw tweets referring to the second Newsnight investigation.

'It would have been inappropriate, when the tweets on that Friday were reported to me, to have intervened and say ‘What are you doing with that programme', he said.

'I did the following day, having seen the programme, seek the director-general’s confirmation that Newsnight was being properly managed. I was assured on that Saturday that it was,' he said.